Back
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, S.ANANTHI, JJ
N.Vanjimuthu – Appellant
Versus
R.Rajangam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details surrounding the appeal against the initial licensing decision are outlined. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the procedural correctness and jurisdictional authority in licensing are discussed. (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. the court's final directives on handling the licensing application assert independence from previous categorization. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.]
We have heard Mr.L.Chandrakumar, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant-fourth respondent, Mr.B.Saravanan, learned Counsel appearing for the first respondent and Mr.K.P.Krishnadass, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2, 3 and 4.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 16.03.2021, in W.P(MD).No.20920 of 2017. The said writ petition was filed by the first respondent herein, praying for a direction upon the second respondent, namely, the Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, to renew his FL3 license to run a bar in the lodge under the name and style 'Gowri Tourist Home', in Batlagundu, Dindigul District, for the period 2016-17 and 2017-18 and to consequently, direct the respondents 3 and 4 herein, to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
