Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
M/s. P & C Projects Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions filed under article 226 regarding tender rejection (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of tender process and petitioner’s compliance (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioner’s bid rejected for being abnormally low (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments on the rejection of bid and public interest (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. respondents justify rejection based on financial rules (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. limits of judicial review in tender matters (Para 36 , 40 , 41 , 47) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed; fresh tender process to continue (Para 48) |
COMMON ORDER
Through the writ petition in W.P. No.9067/2026, while the petitioner has assailed the order cancelling the total tender process, inspite of the petitioner being the lowest tendered and declared as L-1, W.P. No.10127/2026 has been filed against the fresh tender floated by the 2nd respondent for the very same project, that too pending the writ petition in W.P. No.9067/2026.
2. Since W.P. No.10127/2026 has been filed pending the writ petition in W.P. No.9067/2026, this Court had permitted the petitioner to participate in the fresh tender, through order dated 17.03.2026 and had further made it clear that the fresh tender process would be sub
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
