Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Selvapushpa Vinayakar Retail Flower Shop, Rep.by its Proprietor, S.Gopalakrishnan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges interlocutory order in withdrawn suit. (Para 1) |
| 2. revision infructuous; petition closed without costs. (Para 2 , 3) |
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed on the file of the Hon’ble V Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai in IA No.8713 of 2017 in O.S.No.5947 of 2012 dated 30.10.2017.
For Petitioner(s): Ms.P.T.Ramadevi For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Muthuvel Government Advocate (For R3) Ms.Veena Suresh Standing Counsel(CMDA) (For R2)
R1 – No appearance
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed on the file of the Hon’ble V Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai in IA No.8713 of 2017 in O.S.No.5947 of 2012 dated 30.10.2017. 2. It has been placed on record that the suit, of which the present revision had been filed, had been dismissed as withdrawn by the plaintiffs, who are the respondents in the suit.
3. In view of the same, no further adjudication is required to be made in this revision petition. Accordingly, this revision petition stands closed. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
