The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai vs JAK and Sons, Retail Flower Shop

Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 32637

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai – Appellant
Versus
JAK and Sons, Retail Flower Shop – Respondent
C.M.P.Nos.3713 & 3714 of 2018

Important Points

Revision petition closed as underlying suit withdrawn, rendering it infructuous.

Subject

Civil - Revision Petition

Act Referred

Constitution of India: Article 227

Headnote

First Paragraph: No specific statutes analyzed. The petitioner challenged an interlocutory order in a suit via revision under Article 227. The suit was dismissed as withdrawn by plaintiffs (respondents herein). Court found no need for adjudication due to suit withdrawal. Second Paragraph: Issue framed as challenge to trial court order IA No.8722 of 2017. Ratio: Mootness due to suit closure renders revision infructuous. Third Paragraph: Revision petition closed, no costs.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.P.T.Ramadevi
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Muthuvel, Ms.Veena Suresh

Table of Content
1. challenges trial court interlocutory order. (Para 1)
2. underlying suit dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2)
3. revision closed due to mootness. (Para 3)

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed on the file of the Hon’ble V Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai in IA No.8722 of 2017 in O.S.No.6409 of 2012 dated 30.10.2017. 2. It has been placed on record that the suit, of which the present revision had been filed, had been dismissed as withdrawn by the plaintiffs, who are the respondents in the suit.

3. In view of the same, no further adjudication is required to be made in this revision petition. Accordingly, this revision petition stands closed. No costs.