Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 32773
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K. Surender, J
Ambarish Mishra – Appellant
Versus
The General Manager (HR) and Reviewing Authority Head Office Star House, C – 5, “G” Block Bandra – Kurla Complex Bandra (East) Mumbai 400 051. – Respondent
Writ Petition No.30051 of 2018|W.M.P.No.35066 of 2018
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Arunkungumaraj
For the Respondents: No appearance for R.R.1 and 2, Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil for R.3
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Arunkungumaraj
For the Respondents: No appearance for R.R.1 and 2, Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil for R.3
Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition under Article 226 upon counsel's endorsement.
Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenged disciplinary orders passed by bank authorities in References PS:RA:293 dated 1/2/2007, ZO:CBE:IR:210 dated 8/11/2001, and ZO:CBE:IR:170 dated 25/8/2001, seeking quashing and grant of service benefits including notional promotion. The court noted the petitioner's counsel's request for withdrawal with endorsement. The court permitted withdrawal. Second Paragraph: The sole issue was the petitioner's application to withdraw the petition. The court accepted the endorsement as sufficient basis for closure. Third Paragraph: Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition dismissed as withdrawn per endorsement. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
