IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
V.Deenadayalan – Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority / District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Karur District-639 007 – Respondent
Writ Petition
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks mandamus for absolute attachment under tnpid act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petition disposed with time-bound direction, no costs. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
The petitioner, a depositor, is before this Court seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to take action in terms of Sections 4(3) and 7 of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1997.
2. An order of attachment under Section 3 of the Act has been passed by the Government vide G.O. (4D) Nos. 97 dated 23.06.2025 and 186 dated 07.10.2025 against the properties of M/s. Sree Geethanjali Auto Financiers, in which the petitioner is one of the depositors. The said company has failed to return the deposit made by the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite the attachment orders passed by the Government, the respondent has not taken steps to make the attachment absolute, as contemplated under Section 4(3) of the Act. 3. Mr. M. Lingadurai, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondent, on instructions, submitted that appropriate orders will be passed by the respondent under (3) of the Act. The said submission is taken on record.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to take appropriate steps under Section 4(3) of the Act within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.