SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 32794

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
V.Deenadayalan – Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority / District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Karur District-639 007 – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi
For Respondent: Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader

Court directs confirmation of attachment under TNPID Act Section 4(3) within stipulated time upon undertaking by respondent.

Headnote:Under Sections 3, 4(3), and 7 of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1997 (TNPID Act), the government attached properties of a financial establishment that failed to repay depositors. A depositor filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to make the ad-interim attachment absolute. The court noted the attachment orders via G.O. (4D) Nos. 97 dated 23.06.2025 and 186 dated 07.10.2025. The issue framed was whether the respondent failed to act under Section 4(3) to confirm the attachment. The respondent's counsel submitted that appropriate orders would be passed, which the court recorded as binding. The writ petition was disposed of with directions to the respondent to act under Section 4(3) within four weeks from receipt of the order.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for absolute attachment under tnpid act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petition disposed with time-bound direction, no costs. (Para 4)

O R D E R

The petitioner, a depositor, is before this Court seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to take action in terms of Sections 4(3) and 7 of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1997.

2. An order of attachment under Section 3 of the Act has been passed by the Government vide G.O. (4D) Nos. 97 dated 23.06.2025 and 186 dated 07.10.2025 against the properties of M/s. Sree Geethanjali Auto Financiers, in which the petitioner is one of the depositors. The said company has failed to return the deposit made by the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite the attachment orders passed by the Government, the respondent has not taken steps to make the attachment absolute, as contemplated under Section 4(3) of the Act. 3. Mr. M. Lingadurai, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondent, on instructions, submitted that appropriate orders will be passed by the respondent under (3) of the Act. The said submission is taken on record.

4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to take appropriate steps under Section 4(3) of the Act within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top