Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
Vijaya – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Thoothukudi District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to notices for unauthorised construction despite revised plan claim. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. denial of application; entitlement to revised plan regularisation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. direct submission and consideration; no coercive action pending disposal. (Para 6) |
2.Challenging the impugned notices issued by the fourth respondent under Section 56(1) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, dated 14.03.2026 and 18.03.2026 respectively, in respect of the alleged unauthorised construction of a compound wall and buildings, the petitioners have filed the present Writ Petitions.
3.It is the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that though the petitioners had already submitted an application for revised plan approval, the same has not been considered by the authorities concerned, and instead, the impugned notices have been issued.
4.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the fourth respondent submitted that no such application for revised plan approval has been submitted by the petitioners.
5.Be that as it may, the very challenge is with regard to the alleged unauthorised construction. If there is any deviation from the appro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
