Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 32818
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ
M.Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh – Appellant
Versus
S.Mahilavarthini – Respondent
CMA. (MD)Nos.901 and 902 of 2022
Advocates:
For Appellant : Mr.N.Vallinayagam
For Respondent: Mr.K.Samidurai
For Appellant : Mr.N.Vallinayagam
For Respondent: Mr.K.Samidurai
Court permitted withdrawal of family court appeals upon counsel's request and endorsement.
Headnote:First Paragraph: The appeals were filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against orders dated 08.04.2022 in IA No.257 in GWOP No.1089/2019 and IA No.287 of 2021 in HMOP No.338/2018 passed by the Family Court, Madurai. The appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeals, supported by an endorsement. The court permitted the withdrawal. Second Paragraph: The sole issue was the appellant's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The court accepted the submission and endorsement as sufficient grounds for dismissal. Third Paragraph: Civil Miscellaneous Appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's counsel requests withdrawal permission. (Para 1) |
| 2. appeals dismissed as withdrawn without costs. (Para 2) |
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the submission and endorsement made, these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
