SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 32954

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Synge Thomas – Appellant
Versus
The Branch Manager, M/s.Indian Overseas Bank – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: No Appearance
For the Respondents: Mr.G.Lokeshwaran

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's repeated non-appearance.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution directing revalidation of expired demand drafts worth Rs.20 lakhs without charges and compensation for mental anguish due to alleged failure in banking duty. Court noted repeated non-appearance by petitioner on prior and current hearing dates despite directions. Issues framed implicitly as petitioner's diligence in prosecution. Ratio: Absence on multiple occasions indicates lack of interest. Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Table of Content
1. non-appearance leads to listing for dismissal. (Para 1)
2. dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of interest. (Para 2)

ORDER

When this matter was listed for hearing on 07.04.2026, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner therefore, the Registry was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’ today i.e., 09.04.2026.

2. Even today, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top