Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Synge Thomas – Appellant
Versus
The Branch Manager, M/s.Indian Overseas Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. non-appearance leads to listing for dismissal. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of interest. (Para 2) |
ORDER
When this matter was listed for hearing on 07.04.2026, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner therefore, the Registry was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’ today i.e., 09.04.2026.
2. Even today, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
