Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
Hindu Dharma Parishad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mandamus sought for equal worship permissions. (Para 1) |
| 2. repetitive pil dismissed as publicity oriented. (Para 2) |
| 3. petitioner's history of vexatious litigations noted. (Para 3) |
| 4. petition dismissed with costs imposed. (Para 4) |
10. The Joint Commissioner/ Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramaniyaswamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai -625005. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to instruct the 3rd respondent to The Indian Constitution has been violated by denying Hindu devotees of Lord Murugan permission to light lamps and conduct worship top of the Thiruparankundram hill while, at the same time granting such permission to other religious in observance of the Ramadan festival take action on Government Officers who failed to perform their duties properly by initiating disciplinary action against authorized officers regarding the respondents 7 to 10 for violating the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the by considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2026.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.R.Subrama
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
