Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
M/s.Rajam Educational Health and Charitable Trust – Appellant
Versus
The Director of Town and Country Planning – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges refusal of residential layout approval near crusher. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rules require nocs; crusher non-operational per geology noc. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. non-functional unit not 'existing crusher'; rejection arbitrary. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. quash order; direct reconsideration within three months. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
O R D E R
The petitioner assails the impugned order dated 17.12.2025 issued by the second respondent, whereby the petitioner’s application for approval of a residential layout in Survey No. 382/3A, measuring an extent of 1 acre and 84 cents, and Survey No. 382/2B, measuring an extent of 1 acre and 38 cents, in all aggregating to 3 acres and 22 cents, situated at Murugur Village, Thuraiyur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District, was rejected.
2. Heard Mr. C. Vakeeswaran, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D. Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3 and 5, and Ms. Madhuri Donti Reddy, learned counsel for the fourth respondent.
3. Approval of layouts is governed by the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019 . Annexure XVII appended to Rule 9 deals with development in prohibited or restrict
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
