SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33061

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
Kottai Mohamed Faizan – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police (Crime) – Respondent
Criminal Original Petition



Advocates:
For Petitioner(s): Mr.Y.Kajanavas
For Respondent(s): Mr.LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Police cannot harass in civil/commercial money disputes; close upon repayment undertaking.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Section 528 BNSS invoked to restrain police interference in civil/commercial money disputes. Petitioner, a business proprietor, faced dispute over payment for electrical supplies amid company insolvency proceedings before NCLT. Court found dispute purely commercial, closed by police after undertaking to repay. Second Paragraph: Issue framed as whether police enquiry constitutes harassment in money transaction matters. Ratio: Police appropriately closed complaint upon petitioner's repayment undertaking, recognizing civil nature. Third Paragraph: Criminal original petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petition to stop police harassment in business money dispute. (Para 1 , 2)
2. police closed complaint after repayment undertaking. (Para 3)

PRAYER: This criminal original petition filed under Section 528 BNSS to direct the Respondent to not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of enquiry by interfering with the civil and commercial money disputes and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.Y.Kajanavas For Respondent(s): Mr.LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the Respondent to not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of enquiry by interfering with the civil and commercial money disputes.

2.The facts of the case is that the petitioner is a Proprietor of Huda Enterprises. During the course of business between the year 2020-2021, there was a business dispute between the petitioner and the Mukeshkumar Mehatha, Proprietor of M.N.Electricals. The petitioner’s company was eroded in its business and the same was shut down and insolvency proceedings were pending before the National Company Law Board and Tribunal.

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that one Mukeshkumar Mehatha, Prorietor of M.N.Electrical lodged a complaint against the petitioner stating that he received a sum of Rs.31,24,333/- for supply of electricals items. Therefore, the respondent police called and enquired the petitioner and the petitioner has given an undertaking to return within a period of 6 months. Thereafter only, the respondent police closed the complaint as there was a money transaction.

4.In view of the above, the criminal original petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top