Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Pandiammal – Appellant
Versus
Devaraj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges trial court order allowing impleadment in heirship suit. (Para 2) |
| 2. parties dispute heirship via marriage vs. will claims. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. impleadment necessary for parties claiming under unproven will. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. petition dismissed; expedite suit disposal. (Para 8) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed in I.A.No.3 of 2024 in O.S.No.22 of 2024, the plaintiff has preferred the above revision.
2. Before the trial court, the respondents have filed an application in I.A.No.3 of 2024 to implead them as parties to the suit stating that they are the legal heirs of the deceased Kalianna Gounder (a) Kali Gounder through the Will said to be executed on 23.02.2004 and the said application was objected by the plaintiff by filing an objection. On hearing both sides, the trial Court allowed the application holding that since the relief sought for in the suit requires the presence of the parties. Aggrieved over the same, the plaintiff has filed the present revision.
3. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the plaintiff is the only wife - Class-I legal heir of the deceased Kalianna Gounder (a) Kali Gounder, but the respondents 1 to 3 are the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
