SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
Raguvaran – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner(s): M/s.B.Ramar
For Respondent(s):Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate for R1 to R6

The writ petition has been filed underArticle 226of theConstitution of Indiaseeking a direction to official respondents to implement the order dated 14.12.2023 passed in W.P.No.31710 of 2023.

2. We have perused the order dated 14.12.2023, by which, W.P.No.31710 of 2023 was disposed of with certain directions.

3. In the instant petition, petitioner is asking to implement the said order. The writ petition is misconceived and not maintainable.

4. The writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top