IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G. Arul Murugan, J
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Election Commissioner Election Commission of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pil seeks direction for official transfers on representations. (Para 1) |
| 2. pil impermissible in service matters per supreme court. (Para 2) |
| 3. petition misconceived; disposed without costs. (Para 3 , 4) |
By this petition styled as a ‘public interest litigation’, the petitioner seeks a direction upon the respondents to take appropriate action on the petitioner’s representations dated 24.02.2026 and 18.03.2026, regarding transfer of Government officials within the State of Tamil Nadu.
2. It is well settled that no public interest litigation is maintainable in service matters. This issue is covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs. State of Maharashtra , 1(2013) 4 SCC 465, wherein the Apex Court has held that such a course of action is not permissible so far as service matters are concerned.
3. The petitioner’s attempt seeking transfer of officials through a public interest litigation is nothing but perverse and misconceived. Accordingly, we refrain from entertaining this petition. However, the Election Commission of India would be free to deal with the representation if any submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.