Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.VINOD KUMAR, J
K.Ramalingam – Appellant
Versus
M/s.State Express Transport Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges denial of promotion benefits post-retirement. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. dispute over promotion validity and cancellation claim. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. no proof of cancellation order service; claim rejected. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. writ allowed; benefits granted as checking inspector. (Para 14) |
ORDER
Heard Mr.D.Soundar Raj, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Kathiresan, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent and perused the record.
2. The petitioner, by the present Writ Petition, while assailing the action of the respondent in issuing the proceedings in Lr.No.029339/C3/SETC/2017, dated 05.02.2019 had sought for quashing the same with a consequential direction to the respondent to fix his salary in the cadre of Checking Inspector and also sanction fifth review benefits along with payment of arrears.
3. The case of the petitioner in brief is that he was promoted to the post of Checking Inspector from the cadre of Senior Conductor vide proceedings, dated 18.01.2012 and had retired from the said post of Checking Inspector on 30.06.2013; and that the respondent has not granted him the benefits attached to the post of Checking Inspector and on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
