SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33354

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Manikandan – Appellant
Versus
Regional General Manager State Bank of India – Respondent
WMP NO. 30650 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): No appearance
For the Respondent(s): Mr.M.L.Ganesh for R1 & 2, R3 to 8 No Appearance

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after representation disposed by respondent.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution directing the bank to consider representations dated 07.02.2022 and 22.07.2022 regarding alleged fraud by certain respondents. The court noted the petitioner's non-appearance. The respondent submitted that the representation was disposed of on 04.02.2023. Issues framed involved directing action on disposed representation and non-prosecution. The court recorded the submission that the representation was already addressed, rendering the petition infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for bank action on fraud representations. (Para 1)
2. no petitioner appearance; representation disposed earlier. (Para 2 , 3)
3. dismissal for non-prosecution, no costs. (Para 4)

PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 7.02.2022 and the reminder representation dated 22.07.2022 and take the appropriate action against the fraud committed by the 3rd and 5th to 7th respondents For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.M.L.Ganesh for R1 & 2 R3 to 8 No Appearance

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 07.02.2022 and the reminder representation dated 22.07.2022 and take the appropriate action against the fraud committed by the 3rd, and 5th to 7th respondents.

2. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

3. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the official respondents would submit that the petitioner’s representation dated 07.02.2022 was already disposed of by the 2nd respondent as early as on 04.02.2023. Hence, he would submit that nothing survives in this petition and that may be the reason for non-appearance of petitioner. Thus, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

4. In view of the above, by recording the submission made by the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No cost.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top