Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33369
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
R.Saravanan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, District Collector Office, Thanjavur. – Respondent
Writ Petition
Important Points
Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition after arguments, dismissing without costs.
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Act Referred
Headnote
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to direct respondents to consider a representation and initiate departmental proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 against the fifth respondent. The court noted the counsel's request after arguments. Permission granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Palanivelayutham
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Palanivelayutham
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel seeks permission to withdraw petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. permission granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2) |
ORDER
After arguing for quite some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition.
2. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
