Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Palanivelayutham
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition after arguments, dismissing without costs.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to direct respondents to consider a representation and initiate departmental proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 against the fifth respondent. The court noted the counsel's request after arguments. Permission granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Table of Content
1. counsel seeks permission to withdraw petition. (Para 1)
2. permission granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2)

ORDER

After arguing for quite some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition.

2. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :