Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33376

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
Vanathi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District – Respondent
WMP(MD)Nos.8210 and 8211 of 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Subash Babu Senior Consel for M/s.Subash Law Office
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorari to quash a charge memo dated 16.03.2026. The court noted the prayer to challenge the impugned charge memo in Na.Ka.No.A5/32/2025. After arguments, the Senior Counsel sought permission to withdraw. The court considered the endorsement by counsel for withdrawal. The key issue was the request for liberty to pursue alternative remedies. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

ORDER

After arguing for quite some time, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue other remedies.

The learned counsel has made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to pursue other remedies. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscelaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document