Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
Lourdusamy – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Selaiyur Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. magistrate correctly deemed dispute civil; no error found. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. limited revisional scope upholds magistrate's order; revision dismissed. (Para 5 , 6) |
Criminal Revision Case is filed underSection 438read with 442 of BNSS 2023 to set aside the order dated 13.02.2026 made in Crl.M.P.No. 1658 of 2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II at Tambaram and to allow the above Criminal Revision Petition and thus render justice.
For Petitioner(s): M/S. P. Vignesh For Respondent(s): MR.R.KISHORE KUMAR GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE)
ORDER
Criminal Revision Case has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 13.02.2026 made in Crl.M.P.No. 1658 of 2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II at Tambaram.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tambaram, dismissed the application on the ground that the issue arises in respect of money transactions and is purely civil nature.
4. This Court had carefully gone through the reasoning given by the learned Magistrate. On perusal of the same, this Court does not find any palpable error or perversity in the said order. It is also admitted that the complaint came to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
