Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Sathar – Respondent
SA. (MD)Nos.862 and 863 of 2008
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent's death and memo filing noted. (Para 1) |
| 2. non-impleadment causes appeal abatement. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
In this case, the sole respondent had died on 20.11.2001 and a memo was also filed before this Court to that effect on 27.07.2022. Till date, no steps have been taken on the side of the appellant to implead the legal representatives of the deceased respondent.
2. In view of the above, these appeals stand abated and accordingly, the same is closed. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
