Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
T.Subash Bose (Retired) – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's dismissal and pending revision summarized. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's concession for expeditious disposal. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs revision disposal within two months. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Shaji Bino, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent.
2. The petitioner herein while working as the Executive Officer of Village Panchayat was subjected to disciplinary proceedings resulting in imposition punishment of dismissal from service through proceedings bearing G.O.No.387 dated 15.07.2024. The petitioner claims that the said order of dismissal was not served on the petitioner for more than one year and immediately after the same was served upon the petitioner, he has preferred revision petition under Rule 19 of Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955 and since the said revision is not considered by the first respondent, the petitioner approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.
3.The learned Special Government Pleader faily submitted that in case if the revision petition filed by the petitioner is in accordance with law and the same is pending as on date, the sa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
