SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33424

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
T.Subash Bose (Retired) – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.H.Mohamed Imran for M/s. Ajmal Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader

Court directs expeditious disposal of pending service rules revision petition without merits adjudication.

Headnote:The petitioner, a former Executive Officer of Village Panchayat, faced disciplinary proceedings under Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955, resulting in dismissal via G.O. No.387 dated 15.07.2024, served after delay. Petitioner filed revision petition dated 17.11.2025 under Rule 19, pending without disposal. Court directed expeditious consideration without merits. Issue framed: Disposal of pending revision against dismissal order. Ratio: Respondent conceded to consider and dispose revision if procedurally valid, leading to directive for disposal within two months. Writ petition disposed directing respondent to dispose revision petition expeditiously, within two months from order receipt.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's dismissal and pending revision summarized. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondent's concession for expeditious disposal. (Para 3)
3. court directs revision disposal within two months. (Para 4)

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Shaji Bino, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent.

2. The petitioner herein while working as the Executive Officer of Village Panchayat was subjected to disciplinary proceedings resulting in imposition punishment of dismissal from service through proceedings bearing G.O.No.387 dated 15.07.2024. The petitioner claims that the said order of dismissal was not served on the petitioner for more than one year and immediately after the same was served upon the petitioner, he has preferred revision petition under Rule 19 of Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955 and since the said revision is not considered by the first respondent, the petitioner approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

3.The learned Special Government Pleader faily submitted that in case if the revision petition filed by the petitioner is in accordance with law and the same is pending as on date, the same would be considered and disposed of by the respondent expeditiously.

4. In the light of the above, without going into the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to dispose of the revision petition dated 17.11.2025 filed by the petitioner against the orders issued in G.O.(P)No.387, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (TP.3) Department, Chennai, dated 15.07.2024 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top