SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33429

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
Maha Santhosh – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, New Trichy Municipal Office Building, Thillai Nagar 7th Cross, Trichy-620 018 – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Malaimaran
For the Respondents:Mr.V.Boominathan Central Government Standing Counsel for R1, Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Criminal side) for R2

Mere FIR registration does not bar passport renewal under Section 6 of Passports Act, 1967; requires pending court proceedings.

Headnote:Under Section 6 of the Passports Act, 1967, passport authorities may refuse renewal only on specified grounds, including pending criminal proceedings before a competent court. Petitioner applied for passport renewal, which was withheld due to a registered FIR in Crime No.121 of 2020. Court held that mere FIR registration does not constitute pending proceedings. Issues framed as whether FIR alone justifies refusal under Section 6. Court reasoned that statutory bar requires proceedings before a criminal court, not mere FIR. Writ petition allowed; respondents directed to process and issue passport within four weeks, subject to eligibility.

Table of Content
1. passport renewal withheld due to pending fir. (Para 2)
2. criminal case confirmed by police. (Para 3)
3. section 6 requires pending court proceedings, not fir. (Para 5 , 6)
4. fir alone invalidates refusal. (Para 7)
5. direct processing and issuance within four weeks. (Para 9)

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the first respondent to issue a fresh passport pursuant to his application dated 09.03.2026.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite having submitted an application for renewal of his passport, the same has not been processed by the first respondent. According to the petitioner, the application has been kept pending on the ground that a criminal case in Crime No.121 of 2020 has been registered against him.

3. Mr. M. Vaikkam Karunanithi, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the second respondent, on instructions, submitted that a criminal case has indeed been registered against the petitioner.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

5. The refusal to issue or renew a passport is governed by the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967. Under Section 6 of the Act, the Passport Authority is empowered to refuse issuance or renewal of a passport only on the grounds specifically enumerated therein. One such ground is where proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a competent criminal court in India.

6. In the present case, the only reason cited by the respondents is the registration of an FIR against the petitioner. However, mere registration of an FIR does not fall within the grounds contemplated under Section 6 of the Act. The statutory bar operates only when criminal proceedings are pending before a competent criminal court.

7. Therefore, the action of the first respondent in keeping the petitioner’s application pending solely on the basis of the registration of an FIR is not in consonance with the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967.

8. In view of the above, this Court finds merit in the petitioner’s case.

9. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed, and the first respondent is directed to process the petitioner’s application for renewal of passport in File No. TR106651781826 dated 09.03.2026 and issue the passport, subject to the petitioner satisfying all other eligibility criteria prescribed under law.

10. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

11. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top