IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
Maha Santhosh – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, New Trichy Municipal Office Building, Thillai Nagar 7th Cross, Trichy-620 018 – Respondent
Writ Petition
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. passport renewal withheld due to pending fir. (Para 2) |
| 2. criminal case confirmed by police. (Para 3) |
| 3. section 6 requires pending court proceedings, not fir. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. fir alone invalidates refusal. (Para 7) |
| 5. direct processing and issuance within four weeks. (Para 9) |
ORDER
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the first respondent to issue a fresh passport pursuant to his application dated 09.03.2026.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite having submitted an application for renewal of his passport, the same has not been processed by the first respondent. According to the petitioner, the application has been kept pending on the ground that a criminal case in Crime No.121 of 2020 has been registered against him.
3. Mr. M. Vaikkam Karunanithi, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the second respondent, on instructions, submitted that a criminal case has indeed been registered against the petitioner.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.
5. The refusal to issue or renew a passport is governed by the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967. Under Section 6 of the Act, the Passport Authority is empowered to refuse issuance or renewal of a passport only on the grounds specifically enumerated therein. One such ground is where proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a competent criminal court in India.
6. In the present case, the only reason cited by the respondents is the registration of an FIR against the petitioner. However, mere registration of an FIR does not fall within the grounds contemplated under Section 6 of the Act. The statutory bar operates only when criminal proceedings are pending before a competent criminal court.
7. Therefore, the action of the first respondent in keeping the petitioner’s application pending solely on the basis of the registration of an FIR is not in consonance with the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967.
8. In view of the above, this Court finds merit in the petitioner’s case.
9. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed, and the first respondent is directed to process the petitioner’s application for renewal of passport in File No. TR106651781826 dated 09.03.2026 and issue the passport, subject to the petitioner satisfying all other eligibility criteria prescribed under law.
10. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
11. There shall be no order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.