SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33506

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, S.Srimathy, JJ
S.Ramakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
K.J.Praveen Kumaraguru The District Collector, Madurai District. – Respondent
Cont. P(MD)No.2316 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.6113 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.A.K.Manikkam
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Vinodh Government Advocate

Court order compliance negates contempt; liberty granted to challenge implementation.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of the court's order dated 07.03.2025 in W.P.(MD)No.6113 of 2025. The court examined compliance with the prior writ order. The court found that the order has been fully complied with by the respondents. Second Paragraph: The sole issue was whether the respondents wilfully disobeyed the court's order. The court observed direct compliance, negating any contempt, and granted liberty to challenge the implementation legally. Last Paragraph: The contempt petition is closed.

The order of this Court has been complied with. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law. The contempt petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top