IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.KalaimathI, J
S.Tamilselvi – Appellant
Versus
V.Balaji – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. comparative hardship favors wife's transfer request. (Para 1 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 2. wife's hardship due to distance and finances. (Para 2 , 3 , 8) |
| 3. parties' contentions on transfer and alternatives. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The respondent(wife) in H.M.O.P.No.329 of 2022 has filed this petition.
3. Petitioner/wife would aver that she is an unemployed and she has got child aged about 9 years and she finds it difficult to travel from Vandavasi to Chennai for about 260 Kms., up and down for all the Court hearings and she is not in a position to meet out the travelling expenses and other expenses, for which, she depends upon her parents. She needs some assistance on the Court hearing dates.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would reiterate the grounds set out in the petition and seeks to order the petition as prayed for. 5. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent/husband by filing counter would vehemently contend that respondent/husband was all along attending the Court proceedings before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Vandavasi in M.C.No.3 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.