IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
Prema – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep By The Inspector of Police P6 Kodungaiyur Police Station, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges seizure return dismissal in ndps case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. heard arguments, perused records. (Para 4) |
| 3. return phone to non-accused on conditions. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The revision challenges the dismissal of the petitioner’s application seeking return of his Apple Iphone 13, which was seized during the course of investigation in Crime No.857 of 2024 registered for the offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B), 22(a), 25 and 29(1) of theNDPS Act, 1985. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused was found in possession of 1.200 kgs of ganja and 1.53 grams of Methamphetamine, which were recovered by the respondent police from the accused persons. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not an accused in the above crime number and that the petitioner is only the sister of A4. He further submitted that the contraband recovered falls under intermediate quantity and that the petitioner’s mobile phone was seized during the course of investigation. Hence, the petitioner filed an applicationSection 497ofBNSS, 2023seeking return of her property. However, the learned Magistrate dismis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.