Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
M.Thangarasu – Appellant
Versus
M.Punithavathi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to trial court orders on joint trial applications (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner's prior joint trial directions vs respondent delay claims (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. enforce joint trial, reopen pw1 cross-examination (Para 5) |
COMMON ORDER
Challenging the common impugned order in IA Nos.8 & 17 of 2024 dated 23.07.2025 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Bhavani, the plaintiff in the Suit in OS No.8 of 2020 and the defendant in the Suit in OS No.27 of 2020, has preferred the revision petitions.
2. The plaintiff / revision petitioner filed applications before the trial court under Section 151 CPC , praying to set aside the trial proceedings and all subsequent proceedings of the suit in OS No.27 of 2020, since those proceedings were abuse of process of law and enable the petitioner to begin trial of the suit OS No.8 of 2020 as a plaintiff along with the suit OS No.27 of 2020 jointly. Both applications were dismissed on hearing both sides. Aggrieved over the same, the plaintiff has preferred these revision petitions.
3. The learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that already there was a direction given by this Court for joint trial in CRP No.514 of 2022 dated 02.03.2022.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
