Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33619
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
E.Chandrasekar – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Engineer (Personnal) Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No. 36689 of 2025 | W.P.(MD)
Important Points
Court permits withdrawal of duplicate writ petition referencing prior identical filing.
Subject
Civil - Service & Labour
Act Referred
Constitution of India: S.226
Headnote
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus for reinstatement as previously ordered. The court noted an identical prior petition W.P.(MD) No. 36689 of 2025. No specific statutes beyond Article 226 were analyzed. Facts involve a representation dated 20.11.2025 for service reinstatement. The court permitted withdrawal based on counsel's endorsement. No formal issues were framed. The ratio is that duplicate petitions with identical prayers may be withdrawn referencing prior proceedings. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs.K.Gandhiammal
For the Respondents: Mr.B.Ramanathan Standing Counsel
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs.K.Gandhiammal
For the Respondents: Mr.B.Ramanathan Standing Counsel
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel seeks permission to withdraw citing prior identical petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
In light of the earlier order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No. 36689 of 2025, filed by the same petitioner with an identical prayer, the learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
