SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33629

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, R.Poornima, JJ
G.Kannan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, Madurai. – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.P.Ranjith Kumar
For Respondents: Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3.

The petitioner alleges that there are encroachments in S.Nos.73/2, 75/2A and 56/6, Achampatti Village, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District. We had a look at the revenue record. It is seen that these are temple lands. The learned Additional Government Pleader on instruction states that the lands in question continue to be vacant and that there are no encroachments. Be that as it may, if a temple land has been encroached, the revenue authority may not be in a position to take action. If the temple in question comes under the purview of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, then action has to be taken under Section 78 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act by the Joint Commissioner.

2.With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top