SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33707

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ
Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, Madurai – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.Ajaykose (passed away)
For the Respondents: Mr.C.Vinayak Standing Counsel

Table of Content
1. order set aside for lack of notice (Para 2)
2. writ allowed with remand (Para 3)

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner has passed away. Since we intend to remand the matter, we are not adjourning on this ground. The impugned order has been straight away passed without putting the petitioner on notice. Hence, the impugned order stands set aside. The matter is remitted to the file of the second respondent to pass an order afresh in accordance with the law.

3.With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition is allowed. If the order impugned in the writ petition has already been enforced, our order will not take effect. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top