IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Teeam Score, Represented by its Partner Karur Kandasamy Ranjith – Appellant
Versus
The State Tax Officer, Karur -4 Assessment Circle – Respondent
W.M.P(MD)Nos.7508 and 7509 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to appeal rejection for delay. (Para 2) |
| 2. section 107 appeal timelines and condonation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. rival submissions and assessee error acknowledged. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. delay condoned, appeal restored on merits. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
The writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 27.03.2026 and to quash the same and consequently, direct the 2ndrespondent to restore the statutory appeal dated 16.03.2026, condone the delay and dispose of the said appeal.
2. Heard Mr.N.Sudalai Muthu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perusing the material records of the case, it can be seen that, as per Section 107 , an appeal has to be filed within a period of three months. Additionally, the Appellate Authority has the power to condone a delay of up to one month.
4. The filing of the present appeal falls within the condonable period of one month. However, the petitioner did not file an application for condonation of delay and therefore, the appeal was rejected by the Appellate Authority.
5. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that, even if an opportunity is to be granted, the petitioner may be directed to file an application for condonation of delay.
6. I have considered the rival submissions made on either sides and perused the material records of the case.
7. It can be seen from the affidavit filed in support of the application that it was an error on the part of the assessee in not filing an application for condonation of delay. In any event, the delay is within the condonable limit.
8. I am of the view that, instead of directing the assessee to file an application for condonation of delay, considering the nature of the delay, the same can be condoned and the appeal can be taken up for consideration on merits.
9. In view thereof, the writ petition is ordered on the following terms:-
i. The impugned order dated 27.03.2026 shall stand set aside.
ii. The error on the part of the petitioner in not filing an application for condonation of delay is condoned by this Court and considering the number of days of delay, the delay shall stand condoned.
iii.The appeal shall be treated as having the delay condoned, shall be taken on file and shall be considered by the Appellate Authority on its own merits and disposed of in accordance with law.
iv. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.