SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33730

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Teeam Score, Represented by its Partner Karur Kandasamy Ranjith – Appellant
Versus
The State Tax Officer, Karur -4 Assessment Circle – Respondent
W.M.P(MD)Nos.7508 and 7509 of 2026



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.N.Sudalai Muthu
For Respondents: Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

Court condoned condonable delay in GST appeal despite missing application, quashing rejection and restoring for merits.

Headnote:Under Section 107 of the CGST Act, appeals must be filed within three months, with the Appellate Authority empowered to condone delays up to one additional month. The petitioner filed an appeal within the condonable period but omitted an application for condonation, leading to rejection. The court found this to be an assessee error, condoned the delay, set aside the rejection order, and directed restoration for merits consideration. Issues framed: whether rejection without condonation application violated natural justice when delay was condonable. Ratio: Appellate Authority must consider condonable delays substantively; court can condone directly if within limit to avoid technical rejection. Writ petition allowed, impugned order quashed, appeal restored and remanded for disposal on merits.

Table of Content
1. challenges to appeal rejection for delay. (Para 2)
2. section 107 appeal timelines and condonation. (Para 3 , 4)
3. rival submissions and assessee error acknowledged. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. delay condoned, appeal restored on merits. (Para 8 , 9)

ORDER

The writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 27.03.2026 and to quash the same and consequently, direct the 2ndrespondent to restore the statutory appeal dated 16.03.2026, condone the delay and dispose of the said appeal.

2. Heard Mr.N.Sudalai Muthu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perusing the material records of the case, it can be seen that, as per Section 107 , an appeal has to be filed within a period of three months. Additionally, the Appellate Authority has the power to condone a delay of up to one month.

4. The filing of the present appeal falls within the condonable period of one month. However, the petitioner did not file an application for condonation of delay and therefore, the appeal was rejected by the Appellate Authority.

5. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that, even if an opportunity is to be granted, the petitioner may be directed to file an application for condonation of delay.

6. I have considered the rival submissions made on either sides and perused the material records of the case.

7. It can be seen from the affidavit filed in support of the application that it was an error on the part of the assessee in not filing an application for condonation of delay. In any event, the delay is within the condonable limit.

8. I am of the view that, instead of directing the assessee to file an application for condonation of delay, considering the nature of the delay, the same can be condoned and the appeal can be taken up for consideration on merits.

9. In view thereof, the writ petition is ordered on the following terms:-

i. The impugned order dated 27.03.2026 shall stand set aside.

ii. The error on the part of the petitioner in not filing an application for condonation of delay is condoned by this Court and considering the number of days of delay, the delay shall stand condoned.

iii.The appeal shall be treated as having the delay condoned, shall be taken on file and shall be considered by the Appellate Authority on its own merits and disposed of in accordance with law.

iv. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top