Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.P.Rajavel
For Contemnor(s):Mr.C.Gouthamaraj, Government Advocate

Counsel's submission of compliance closes contempt petition without inquiry.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 09.09.2025 in W.P.No.33685 of 2025. The essential fact was the claim of non-compliance by public officials. The court recorded submission of compliance, finding no wilful disobedience. Second Paragraph: The sole issue was whether the respondents disobeyed the prior writ order. The ratio decidendi is that counsel's submission of compliance suffices to close contempt proceedings without further inquiry. Third Paragraph: Contempt Petition stands closed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's counsel submits order compliance. (Para 1)
2. court closes contempt petition. (Para 2)

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order of this Court dated 09.09.2025 made in W.P.No.33685 of 2025, has been complied with.

2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :