Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
P.Selvakumari – Appellant
Versus
Rajendiran – Respondent
Contempt Petition | W.P.No. 36235 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's representation rejected by respondent. (Para 1) |
| 2. no contempt; petition closed, challenge rejection separately. (Para 2) |
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the representation of the petitioner was considered and the 1st respondent has rejected the request of the petitioner vide order dated 29.03.2026.
2.Considering the above submission, this Court is of the view that since the petitioner’s representation was considered and rejected by the 1st respondent, if the petitioner is aggrieved over the order of the 1st respondent dated 29.03.2026, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law.
3.In view of the above, this contempt petition stands closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
