IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
K.Muthupandian – Appellant
Versus
M.Selvalakshmi – Respondent
CMP NO. 11712 OF 2024|O.S.No. 3672 of 2021|I.A.No. 5 of 2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to trial court order rejecting plaint dismissal application. (Para 1) |
| 2. defendant argues incorrect valuation and court fee lacking jurisdiction. (Para 3) |
| 3. jurisdiction upheld; court fee issue for trial disposal within three months. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed in I.A.No.5 of 2023 in O.S.No.3672 of 2021 by the learned XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, the Revision Petitioner/defendant preferred this Civil Revision Petition. 2.Before the trial court, the Revision Petitioner/defendant filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. in I.A.No.5 of 2023 praying to reject the plaint on the ground that the trial court has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit and also on the ground that the respondent/plaintiff had paid ad valorem court fee as such is not correct. The said application was contested by the respondent/plaintiff. On hearing both sides, the trial judge dismissed the said application. Aggrieved over that, this Civil Revision Petition has been filed.
3.The learned counsel for revision petitioner/defendant would submit that the valuation of the property was wrongly mentioned in the suit and the court fee also paid by the respondent/plaintiff as such is not correct one. Therefore, the trial court has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit, but without considering the same, the trial judge proceeded with the matter and erroneously dismissed the application. Hence, he raised objections and prayed to set aside the findings of trial judge.
4. As on date, trial has begun. The plaintiff’s side evidence was closed and for cross-examination of P.W.1, the case was posted. If at all, proper court fee is not paid, the respondent/plaintiff is not entitled to raise the suit. Therefore, the trial judge is directed to decide the issue with regard to court fee and dispose the case in the manner known to law. However, the findings rendered by the trial judge with regard to jurisdiction requires no interference. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as no merit and the findings rendered in I.A.No.5 of 2023 in O.S.No. 3672 of 2021 is confirmed. The trial judge is directed to complete the trial and dispose case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.