Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
K.Mayandi – Appellant
Versus
Raman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's long possession of poramboke land; defendants claim ownership via sale deed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. appellants argue lack of possession proof and valid title. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. prior rent proceedings admit possession; entitled to possessory title declaration. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. sale deed boundaries mismatch; no better title proven. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. appeal dismissed; liberty for title suit. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
The unsuccessful defendants 1 to 3 are the appellants. The 1st respondent herein filed a suit seeking declaration of his possessory title over the suit property and also for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The suit was decreed by the Trial Court and the findings of the Trial Court were affirmed by the first appellate court. Aggreived by the concurrent findings, the defendants 1 to 3 have come before this court.
2. According to the first respondent/plaintiff, the suit property is a “Gramanatham poramboke”. The plaintiff and his predecessor-in-interest have been in possession and enjoyment of the suit property for the past 50 years. The plaintiff has been ru
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
