SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33780

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Dr.P.Bharathi Mohan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai – Respondent
Writ Petition | Na.Ka.no.Va.Ni. 5(4)/17486/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.Ulagammal
For the Respondents:Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugan, Government Advocate

Court directs disposal of Arms Act appeal within 12 weeks from order receipt.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to direct disposal of an appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act read with Rule 105 of the Arms Rules 2016. The appeal concerns Na.Ka.no.Va.Ni. 5(4)/17486/2024 pending before the Commissioner of Revenue Administration. The court directed expeditious disposal within 12 weeks from receipt of the order. Issues framed relate to delay in disposing the pending appeal. The ratio decidendi emphasizes timely disposal of statutory appeals to ensure justice. The writ petition is allowed with directions for disposal within 12 weeks without costs.

Table of Content
1. parties heard on pending appeal. (Para 2)
2. time-bound disposal ordered without costs. (Para 3)

2. The District Magistrate / District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS, directing the 1st responded to dispose of the appeal pending in Na.Ka.no.Va.Ni. 5(4)/17486/2024 filed by the petitioner under section 18 of Arm act r/w 105 of Arms Rule 2016 within the stipulated period as fixed by this Honble court and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

For Petitioner : M/s.Ulagammal For Respondents : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugan Government Advocate ORDER The relief sought for in the writ petition is to direct the 1strespondent to dispose of the appeal pending in Na.Ka.no.Va.Ni. 5(4)/17486/2024 filed by the petitioner under section 18 of Arm act r/w 105 of Arms Rule 2016

2. Heard M/s.Ulagammal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugan, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. Since the appeal is said to be pending, the writ petition is ordered on the following terms:-

i. The appeal filed by the petitioner in Na.Ka.no.Va.Ni. 5(4)/17486/2024 shall be disposed of by the 1strespondent within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of the order without waiting for the certified copy of the order.

ii. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top