Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
R.Thangaraj – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quash impugned order and remit for reconsideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. review of submissions and case records. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. order flawed lacking specifics and opportunity. (Para 4) |
| 4. set aside order, direct compliant procedure. (Para 5) |
For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For R1 to R5 : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader ORDER The present writ petition has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 23.03.2026 and to consequently direct the 5th respondent to consider the petitioner's application in accordance with law.
2. Heard Mr.H.Mohammed Imran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Lingadurai, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5.
3. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perusing the material records of the case, it can be seen that when the proceedings were initiated to recognize the new correspondents, the petitioner was directed to submit all other relevant records relating to the school, which include the fire safety certificate as well. It is also stated that the petitioner has already obtained the stability certificate in respect of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
