SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33787

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
R.Thangaraj – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.M.P(MD).Nos.7316 and 7317 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader

Administrative rejections must specify deficiencies and provide opportunity to rectify before denial.

Headnote:The petitioner sought recognition for a new school correspondent, submitting a stability certificate but facing rejection for lacking a fire safety certificate and other documents. Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the court examined the impugned order dated 23.03.2026 issued by the fire service station officer. The court found the order deficient due to absence of specific details on missing certificates and lack of opportunity for the petitioner to rectify. The primary issue was whether the rejection order complied with principles of natural justice by specifying deficiencies and granting hearing. The ratio decidendi holds that administrative orders rejecting applications must detail missing requirements and provide opportunity to comply, ensuring procedural fairness before denial. The impugned order was set aside, matter remitted to the respondent for reconsideration with directions to specify further documents needed, allowing petitioner to produce or reply within four weeks.

Table of Content
1. quash impugned order and remit for reconsideration. (Para 1)
2. review of submissions and case records. (Para 2 , 3)
3. order flawed lacking specifics and opportunity. (Para 4)
4. set aside order, direct compliant procedure. (Para 5)

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For R1 to R5 : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader ORDER The present writ petition has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 23.03.2026 and to consequently direct the 5th respondent to consider the petitioner's application in accordance with law.

2. Heard Mr.H.Mohammed Imran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Lingadurai, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5.

3. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perusing the material records of the case, it can be seen that when the proceedings were initiated to recognize the new correspondents, the petitioner was directed to submit all other relevant records relating to the school, which include the fire safety certificate as well. It is also stated that the petitioner has already obtained the stability certificate in respect of the building, with reference to the fire safety certificate. However, the same was rejected by the impugned order dated 23.03.2026. The entire order is extracted hereunder for ready reference:

4. Thus, it can be seen that the order was issued on the regard that the relevant certificates were not annexed along with the application. No details were mentioned, and no opportunity was granted to the petitioner to produce any other document that was also required along with the application.

5. In view thereof, this writ petition is ordered on the following terms:-

i. The impugned order dated 23.03.2026 shall stand set aside and the matter is remitted back to the file of the 5th respondent.

ii. The petitioner shall appear before the 5th respondent along with a web copy of the order. The 5th respondent shall inform the petitioner in writing about any further documents needed for the application.

iii.After receiving the said communication, it will be open for the petitioner to either immediately produce the required documents or file a reply in reference thereto. If any document is deemed irrelevant or is not available thereafter, it will be for the 5th respondent to consider the same and pass orders granting the fire safety certificate as requested by the petitioner.

iv. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of appearance of the petitioner.

v. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top