SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 33853

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
M.Senthamizh Selvan – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.8953 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.L.Dhilipan Pandian for Mr.K.Vijayan
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Sasikumar (R1 & R3), Additional Government Pleader Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabakar (RR2, 4 & 5), Additional Public Prosecutor

Mandamus denied as action taken; court directs age verification in mass marriages to prevent child marriages.

Headnote:The petitioner invoked Article 226 seeking mandamus under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 to direct monitoring of mass marriage schemes after a 2023 event involved a 16-year-old bride. The court noted action initiated under POCSO Act, 2012 and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, finding existing measures adequate but issuing directive for age verification. Issue framed: direction for preventive measures against child marriages in mass functions. Ratio: state's submission of ongoing action suffices, but verification of legal age (18 for bride) required in mass marriages to prevent violations. Writ petition dismissed with direction to District Collector for age verification in mass marriages; no costs.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks monitoring to prevent child marriages in mass functions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. state action initiated; direct age verification required. (Para 5 , 6)

This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to take necessary preventive and regulatory measures to monitor mass marriage schemes and functions so as to prevent occurrence of child marriages.

2.Mr.D.Sasikumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondents 1 and 3 and Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice for the respondents 2, 4 and 5. In view of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the sixth respondent is dispensed with.

3.By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.

4.The contention of the petitioner is that during the year 2023, a mass marriage function was conducted in connection with the 85th birthday celebration of a public personality, wherein about 85 couples were married. In that mass marriage, one of the brides from Thanjavur District was a minor girl aged about 16 years at the time of marriage. Hence, the petitioner seeks a direction to follow some regulatory measures while conducting such mass marriage.

5.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 3, on instructions, submitted that action has already been initiated under the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.

6.In view of the above submission, no further direction is required in this regard. However, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the third respondent to ensure that whenever mass marriage functions are conducted, it is verified that the parties to the marriage have attained the legal age, namely 18 years in the case of the bride.

7.With the above direction, this writ petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top