IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
P.Samiappan – Appellant
Versus
The Management of – Respondent
##PAGE1##
W.P(MD) No.8357 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 27.03.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
W.P(MD) No.8357 of 2026
P.Samiappan ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.,
Karur Region, Rep. by its General Manager,
Karur. ... Respondent
PRAYER:-Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner amount towards the encashment of 116 days of earned leaves surrendered by him in the years before his retirement either based on his monthly wages of the respective months of surrender of those earned leaves, together with 18% interest p.a. from the respective due dates or based on the monthly wages payable on the month of his retirement, together with 18% interest from the date of his
retirement.
1/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/04/2026 11:56:17 am )
##PAGE2##W.P(MD) No.8357 of 2026
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondent : Mr.K.Ramiah
Standing Counsel
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ of
mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner amount towards the encashment of 116 days of earned leaves surrendered by him in the years before his retirement either based on his monthly wages of the respective months of surrender of those earned leaves, together with 18% interest p.a. from the respective due dates or based on the monthly wages payable on the month of his retirement, together with 18% interest
from the date of his retirement.
2. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up
for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3.The case of the petitioner is that in terms of the settlement
arrived under Section 12(3) of the ID Act, the employees of the
2/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/04/2026 11:56:17 am )
##PAGE3##W.P(MD) No.8357 of 2026
respondent Corporation are entitled to surrender Earned Leave of 15 days in one year or 30 days in 2 years and the remaining 15 days, or 30 days as the case may be, can be accumulated as terminal Earned Leave upto
maximum of 240 days.
4. The petitioner herein, who has retired from service is
allowed to encash 240 days of of Earned Leave. However, the petitioner claims that he has 116 days more Earned Leave available, which were earned by him during the period 2011 to 2019. But the petitioner was not allowed to encash the said Earned Leave at the relevant point of time due to financial crisis being faced by the respondent Corporation. Hence, he claims that he is entitled to encash the same, but the respondent Corporation is not allowing him to encash. Hence, he contend that the petitioner is entitled for encashment of the Earned Leave that is available to the credit of the petitioner and for payment of the same with interest at
6% per annum.
5. At the threshold, the learned counsel appearing for the
3/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/04/2026 11:56:17 am )
##PAGE4##W.P(MD) No.8357 of 2026
petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court that the very same issue has fallen for consideration before this Court in W.P(MD)No.2449 of 2018 and a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 02.04.2018 allowed an identical claim under identical fact situation. A copy of the same is also placed before this Court. It is also further brought to the notice of this Court that the said order of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 02.04.2018 was also confirmed by a Hon'ble Division Bench
of this Court in W.A(MD)No.210 of 2019 by order dated 04.09.2019.
6. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
respondent Corporation also has not disputed about the said legal
position.
7. In the light of the same, this Court does not find any
reason to re-adjudicate the matter once again. In W.P(MD)No.2449 of
2018 at paragraph Nos.11 to 14 this Court held as under :
''11. It is not in dispute that there was 12(3)
sett
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.