2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 34042
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
SUSILA YUVARAJ – Appellant
Versus
D.KUMARESAN – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRL RC No. 339 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25-03-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRL RC No. 339 of 2021
Susila Yuvaraj ..Petitioner
Vs D.Kumaresan ..Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records and set aside the judgment of the learned VII Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, made in Criminal Appeal No.59 of 2019 dated 15.03.2021 confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate FTC IV, George Town, Chennai made in C.C.No.1523 of 2016 by Judgment dated 22.02.2019 convicting the petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and Sentencing her to undergo ten months simple imprisonment and to pay a compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- under Section 357(3) of Cr.P.C within one month and in default of payment of the compensation to undergo further period of two months simple
imprisonment.
For Petitioner: Mr.A.Thirumaran
For Respondent: M/s.J.Tamilarasi
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed as against the Judgment dated
15.03.2021 passed in C.A.No.59 of 2019 on the file of the VII Additional
__________
Page1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/04/2026 01:38:15 pm )
##PAGE2##CRL RC No. 339 of 2021
Sessions Judge, Chennai, thereby confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, FTC_IV, George Town, Chennai, in C.C.No.1523 of 2016 dated 22.02.2019, for the offence punishable under
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the
materials available on record.
3. The petitioner is the accused in the complaint lodged by the
respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After a full-fledged trial, the Trial Court found the accused guilty and convicted him for the said offence and the same was confirmed by the Appellate Court. Hence, the present Criminal Revision Case has been filed.
4. Pending revision, it is submitted that the parties have amicably
settled the dispute and the petitioner has paid the entire cheque amount to the
respondent and also entered into a compromise.
5. In view of the above settlement, the Judgment dated 15.03.2021
passed in C.A.No.59 of 2019 on the file of the VII Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, FTC_IV, George Town, Chennai, in C.C.No.1523 of 2016 dated
__________
Page2 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/04/2026 01:38:15 pm )
##PAGE3##CRL RC No. 339 of 2021
22.02.2019, is hereby set aside and the terms of Joint Memo of Compromise,
dated 20.09.2019 shall form part and parcel of this order.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case stands allowed.
25-03-2026
Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
LPP
To
1.The VII Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai.
2. The Metropolitan Magistrate, FTC_IV, George Town, Chennai.
__________
Page3 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/04/2026 01:38:15 pm )
##PAGE4##CRL RC No. 339 of 2021
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN J.
LPP
CRL RC No. 339 of 2021
25-03-2026 __________
Page4 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/04/2026 01:38:15 pm )