SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 34257

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
B.Kanagasundaram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR B.Kanagasundaram ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Director General of Police, Head of Police Force, Chennai - 600 004.

3.The Director General of Police, (Armed Police) Head Quarters, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.

4.The Inspector General of Police, Armed Police, Chennai - 600 010.

5.The Commandant, TSP XI Battalion, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to re-fix the seniority of the petitioner on the basis of the marks secured by him in the Police Recruitment School in accordance with Rule 24 of the Tamil Nadu Special Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1978, on par with the benefit extended to similarly placed persons pursuant to the orders passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.7266 of 2020 dated 11.10.2023 and confirmed by the Honble Supreme Court in S.L.P. (C) No.339 of 2024 dated 08.01.2024 and consequently directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Commandant by placing him above his junior P.Sekar with all consequential service and monetary benefits.

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.V.Omprakash Government Advocate

O R D E R

Heard Mr.H.Mohammed Imran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Omprakash, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

2. With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

3. The petitioner herein was appointed as a Grade-II Police Constable on 01.03.1995 and was thereafter promoted from time to time.

Ultimately, he was promoted as Inspector of Police on 23.05.2023 in TSP XI Battalion, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District and is working as such as on date.

4. The petitioner claims to have come to know that one Mr.P.Sekar, who is junior to him in the cadre of Inspector of Police, had approached this Court by filing W.P.(MD) No.7511 of 2020 seeking refixation of his seniority by taking into consideration the marks secured by him in the Police Recruitment School, in conformity with Rule 24 of the Tamil Nadu Special Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1978. The said Writ Petition was allowed by this Court by an order dated 11.10.2022. According to the petitioner, by virtue of the said order, the said Sekar has become senior to him.

5. Therefore, the petitioner claims to have made a request for revision of his seniority on par with the said Sekar. The same was forwarded by the fifth respondent to the second respondent through a letter dated 18.02.2026 bearing reference Na.Ka.No.A1/8744/2025, and the same is pending consideration.

6. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to refix the seniority of the petitioner on the basis of the marks secured by him in the Police Recruitment School, in accordance with Rule 24 of the Tamil Nadu Special Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1978, on par with the benefit extended to similarly placed persons and consequently directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Commandant by placing him above his junior, Mr.P.Sekar, with all consequential service and monetary benefits.

7. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that the request made by the petitioner on 17.02.2026 was immediately attended to and that the same was forwarded by the fifth respondent to the second respondent through the third respondent on 18.02.2026 and that appropriate orders will be passed by the second respondent as expeditiously as possible.

8. In light of the above, without going into the merits of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top