SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 34331

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
J.Annalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu Repre – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P(MD).No.6342 of 2026 J.Annalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Tamilnadu Represented by the Tahsildar Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondent to issue a separate patta to petitioner's name in respect of petitioner's agricultural land in Survey No. 268/3C total extent 42 Ares (1 acre 4 cents) out of 50 cents in joint patta No.2165 situated at Vikkiramangalam Village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District, based on petitioner's sale deed Doc.No.1694 of 2005 dated 15.11.2005 and petitioner's application No.2025/0105/24 dated 03.11.2025 within a specific period as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondent : Mr.S.Shanmugave Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the Respondent to issue a separate patta to petitioner's name in respect of petitioner's agricultural land in Survey No.268/3C total extent 42 Ares (1 acre 4 cents) out of 50 cents in joint patta No.2165 situated at Vikkiramangalam Village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District, based on petitioner's sale deed Doc.No.1694 of 2005 dated 15.11.2005 and petitioner's application No.2025/0105/24 dated 03.11.2025 within a specific period as fixed by this Court.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner purchased the property through a sale deed registered as Doc. No. 1694 of 2005, dated 15.11.2005. The petitioner subsequently filed an online application (No. 2025/0105/24) on 03.11.2025, after paying the requisite charges. However, the revenue officials failed to conduct a survey of the property. Consequently, the petitioner filed a writ petition in W.P.(MD) No. 33436 of 2025, pursuant to which the respondents conducted the survey but did not issue a separate patta.

3. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing the respondent.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the respondent to conduct an enquiry after issuing notice to the petitioner and the other joint pattadars. Upon completion of the enquiry, the respondent shall issue separate patta in accordance with the sale deed and the survey conducted. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With these directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

10.03.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No msrm To

1. The Tahsildar Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.

2. The Additional Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai S.SRIMATHY, J msrm Order made in

10.03.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top