Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
Sirajudeen Sayeed – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Waqf Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. waqf board's quasi-judicial decisions must be reasoned and follow due process. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 34) |
| 2. requirements of waqf creation: intention to dedicate and complete divestment. (Para 6 , 12 , 15 , 17 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 3. limitation period for challenging waqf board orders after court-granted liberty. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. distinguishing private family waqf (waqf-alal-aulad) from public waqf. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
ORDER
1.The revision petitioner, now by legal representatives, is the plaintiff in O.S.No.23 of 2022 before the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal. The plaintiff, being unsuccessful before the Waqf Board, preferred an appeal before the Waqf Tribunal. The same was dismissed by a judgment and decree dated 11.10.2022, as against which, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.
2.I have heard Mr.Balan Haridas, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Mr.Haja Mohideen Gisthi, learned counsel for the 1st respondent, Mrs.A.Ajimath Begum, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and Mr.Zaffarullah Khan, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent.
3.Mr.Balan Haridas, learned counsel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
