SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Ashwin Smith v. Invent Assets Securitisation and Reconstruction and Anr.


2025 LiveLaw (SC) 774 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SANJAY KUMAR; J., SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA; J.

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12812 OF 2024; August 05, 2025 Sincere Securities Private Limited & Ors. versus Chandrakant Khemka & Ors.

Insolvency and bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 62 – Appeal - Section 14 - Moratorium - IBC Moratorium doesn’t bar voluntary surrender of corporate debtor’s leased property to lessor if retaining the asset is deemed unviable and the Committees of Creditors (CoC) endorses decision - Held that commercial wisdom of the CoC should be given primacy during CIRP (Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process) - this case was distinguished from a simple recovery of property barred by Section 14(1)(d) of the IBC, as the CoC and Resolution Professional themselves desired to return the property due to adverse financial implications of retaining it - The respondent was stalling the process for “undisclosed and extraneous reasons” - Section 14(1)(d) of the IBC states that once the adjudicating authority, by order, declares a moratorium, it would prohibit, amongst other acts, the recovery of any property by an owner or lessor where such property is occupied by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top