IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. MALA, J
Ravivarman (Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
T.G.Rangaswamy (Deceased) – Respondent
Civil Revision Petition
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks expedited execution of possession decree. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents deliberately prolong litigation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. delays and late appeal disclosure show bad faith. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court orders execution disposal within eight weeks. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
(1) The Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking for a direction to the Executing Court to expedite the disposal of EP.No.75/2023 filed to execute the judgment and decree dated 06.02.2023, made in OS.No.127/2018, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
(2) Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents herein, notice to the respondents is dispensed with.
(3) The petitioners in the above Civil Revision Petition, filed a suit for recovery of possession and for cost. The suit was contested by the defendants and a judgment and decree was passed in favour of the petitioners on 06.02.2023. Pursuant to the judgment and decree of the Trial Court, the petitioner filed an execution petition in EP.No.75/2023 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Vellore, to execute the decree.
(4) The petitioners state that the respondents were deliberately prolonging the litigation and obstructing the petitioners from enjoying the fruits of the decree and therefore, the petitioners were constrained to file the above Civil Revision Petition for the aforesaid relief.
(5) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the materials placed on record.
(6) From the materials placed before this Court, particularly, the adjudication history of the EP proceedings, it is seen that EP.No.75/2023 was filed on 01.06.2023 before the learned Additional District Judge, Vellore.. It is further seen that the EP was adjourned periodically for counter of the respondents and for enquiry. It was only on 27.01.2026, the respondents filed a Memo stating that the First Appeal in AS.SR.No.62066/2023 was filed and was pending. This Court finds from the adjudication history that right from 15.04.2025 till 27.01.2026, the respondents sought adjournments in the enquiry and for the first time, on 27.01.2026, they filed the Memo stating that the appeal in AS.SR.No.62066/2023 was filed.
(7) The judgment and decree in the suit in OS.No.127/2018, was passed on 06.02.2023. The EP was filed by the petitioners on 01.06.2023. Three years after the EP was filed, the respondents, for the first time, by Memo dated 27.01.2026, revealed to the Execution Court that an appeal was filed by them in AS.SR.No.62066/2023. It is also pertinent to note here that though the appeal was filed as early as in the year 2023, till 27.01.2026, the same was not numbered and therefore, this Court is of the view that the conduct of the respondents prima facie indicates lack of bona fides and suggest an attempt to protract and obstruct the execution proceedings. Moreover, even the appeal is still in SR stage.
(8) Hence, this Court is inclined to direct the Executing Court, namely, the learned Additional District Judge, Vellore, to expedite the hearing of EP.No.75/2023, and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(9) The Civil Revision Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.