IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
A.Mohandoss – Appellant
Versus
The Election commission of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pil seeks mandamus for investigation of election complaints. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner alleges misuse; respondents cite vagueness. (Para 3) |
| 3. writ limited to pleadings; no evidence for facts. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. pil not maintainable in service matters; petition dismissed. (Para 9 , 10) |
The petitioner has filed this writ petition, styled as public interest litigation, seeking issuance of a mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to forthwith investigate the complaints dated 18.03.2026 and 23.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner, including conducting a forensic examination of the official and unofficial telephone records of Dr.P.Umanath IAS, his communications with the district administration and police authorities and the assets and connections of his associate Kadarkarai, and further direct the respondent authorities to submit a status report/ action taken report on the said complaints.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the third respondent herein is presently serving as Secretary-I to the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and is exercising administrative influence and communicating with District Collectors and police authorities and interfering in the gover
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.