Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
The Management of Sripak Logistics (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
G.Vasu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. workmen claimed illegal termination after denied wages; labour court awarded compensation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. management denied employment; workmen cited lack of evidence from management. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. no denial of employment or records led to adverse inference confirming employee status and illegal termination. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. awards upheld with payment direction and interest; petitions dismissed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
COMMON ORDER
Since the issue involved in all these Writ petitions are similar in nature, they are disposed of by way of this common order.
2. For brevity, the petitioner in all these Writ Petitions are hereinafter referred to as the 'management' and the respondent in all these Writ petitions are hereinafter referred to as the 'workmen'. The respondent/workman in W.P.No.24889 of 2018 passed away and his legal heirs are brought on record as Respondents 2 to 4 in the said writ petition.
3. These Writ petitions have been filed seeking quashment of the impugned awards all dated 29.06.2018 made in I.D.Nos.72, 71, 70, 68 & 69 of 2009 respectively on the file of the III Additional Labour Court, Chennai.
4. The short facts necessary for disposal of these Wri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
