Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, K.SURENDER, JJ
S.Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Tiruppur District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pendency of writ petition affects enforcement actions. (Para 2) |
| 2. authorities must proceed with enforcement actions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. temple administration granted participation rights. (Para 5) |
Order
[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 8 to remove the encroachment made by the 9threspondent inS.F.No.721 situated at Perunjervazhi, Kangayam Taluk, TiruppurDistrict by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 27.08.2022 and the proceedings dated 13.09.2022.
2. With reference to the relief sought for in the present writ petition for removal of encroachment, the learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that the competent authorities conducted a survey and identified encroachments. Consequently, a notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, was issued on 22.12.2023. However, on account of pendency of the present writ petition, no further action is initiated.
3. This Court is of the view that once the enforcement action has already been commenced after identifying the encroachment, the competent authority has to proceed with all further action by aff
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
