D.Sirajudeen vs The District Collector District Collectorate Office Krishnagiri District.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 34714

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
D.Sirajudeen – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector District Collectorate Office Krishnagiri District. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.R.Divyapreathika
For the Respondents:Ms.Akila Rajendran, Government Advocate, for respondents 1 to 4, Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.5

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

2. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 34714

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASSUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, JD.Sirajudeen – AppellantVersusThe District Collector District Collectorate Office Krishnagiri District. – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
D.Sirajudeen – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector District Collectorate Office Krishnagiri District. – Respondent