Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
M.Ganeshkumar – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ seeks mandamus for affidavit verification. (Para 1) |
| 2. article 329(b) bars writs for election disputes. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. case holds detailed affidavit inquiry via election petition. (Para 4) |
| 4. non-disclosure ground only for election petitions. (Para 5) |
| 5. writ dismissed; pursue election petition remedy. (Para 6) |
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing respondent Nos.3 and 4 to verify into the financial disclosures, sources of income, transactions, and statutory filings of the 5th respondent made in his election affidavits filed before the 4th respondent.
For Petitioner(s): Ms.Kavitha Deenadayalan For Respondent(s): Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan Additional Solicitor General Assisted by Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel for R1 Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan for R3 & R4 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing respondents 3 and 4 to verify into the financial disclosures, sources of income, transactions, and statutory filings of 5th respondent made in his election affidavits file
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
